​

Forestbrook in Horry County, South Carolina, has undergone a rapid transformation from a forested landscape into an area dominated by ongoing construction and land clearing. What once functioned as the ecological “lungs” of the community, the tree canopy, birdsong, shade, and soil stability, now has been replaced by exposed clay soils, heavy machinery traffic, and construction debris. This shift represents an environmental justice concern because it affects both the human residents and the more‑than‑human ecosystems embedded within the community.

From an ecological perspective, the impacts of deforestation and development are visible and ongoing. Large area of tree cover have been removed, leaving the land vulnerable to erosion and destabilization. Community observation also indicates a noticeable decline in bird presence and birdsong, suggesting habitat disruption and displacement.

Human health and well‑being are also affected by these changes. Dust, soil particles, and construction debris are now constant features of the local environment, contributing to poorer perceived air quality. Noise and visual disturbance further increase daily stress levels, replacing what was once a calmer, shaded environment. Exposure to construction‑related air pollution, particularly particulate matter, is a documented concern for vulnerable populations such as children and older adults (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [EPA], n.d.).

To better understand these impacts, publicly available data sources were examined to connect lived experience with environmental monitoring systems. AirNow provides real‑time air quality information, including the Air Quality Index and particulate pollution levels, while EPA AirData offers access to monitored air quality datasets (AirNow, n.d.; EPA, n.d.). However, South Carolina public health authorities acknowledge that air quality monitoring is limited and that fixed monitoring stations may not capture neighborhood‑level variation. This limitation makes community‑based observation and reporting especially important in identifying localized environmental stressors (South Carolina Department of Public Health [SCDPH], n.d.).

On the development side, Horry County offers public tools such as an Active Permits dashboard, which allows residents to track construction activity at the neighborhood level, including areas such as Forestbrook. While these tools increase transparency around development activity, they do not include assessments of ecological or biodiversity impacts (Horry County Government, n.d.). Despite visible environmental change, there is no comprehensive, publicly available county‑level biodiversity assessment to document or track cumulative ecological impacts in Horry County.

In conclusion, Forestbrook is experiencing a measurable decline in ecological health alongside an increase in environmental stressors that affect daily life. Development does not inherently require ecological degradation; however, without stronger attention to conservation, erosion control, biodiversity monitoring, and localized air quality impacts, continued development will further harm both the ecosystem and the people who live within it.

​

​

References:

​

AirNow. (n.d.). Air quality data and forecasts. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.airnow.gov

​

Global Forest Watch. (2024). Deforestation rates and statistics for Horry County, South Carolina. https://www.globalforestwatch.org/dashboards/country/USA/41/26/

 

Horry County Government. (n.d.). Land development and active permits. https://www.horrycountysc.gov

 

South Carolina Department of Public Health. (n.d.). Air quality monitoring and public health. https://dph.sc.gov

 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (n.d.). AirData: Air quality data collected at outdoor monitors. https://www.epa.gov/outdoor-air-quality-data

​

​

​